Bookmakers Rating 
Player Ratings 
Biggest Bookmakers 
Bookmakers by Country 
Highest Odds 
Scam Bookmakers 
Bet Builder 
Cash Out 
Live Streaming 
Low deposit 
Fast Withdrawals 
No Verification 
Bookmakers Comparison 
Best Bookmakers for 2023 
New Australian Bookmakers 
Best Canadian Sportsbooks 
Best UK Bookmakers 
Best USA Sportsbooks 
Bitcoin 
VISA 
Mastercard 
PayPal 
Paysafecard 
Skrill 
Neteller 
EcoPayz 
MuchBetter 
Apple Pay 
Best Sports Bookmakers 
Best Football Bookmakers 
Basketball 
NBA 
Euroleague 
Cricket 
NFL 
Horse Racing 
Greyhound Racing 
Betting Bonus 
Freebet Offers 
Mobile Bonuses 
Promo Codes 
Βitcoin Bonuses 
Bookmaker Promotions 
Reload Bonuses 
Accumulator Offers 
Acca Insurance Offers 
Enhanced Odds Offers 
Best Odds Guaranteed 
Belgium 
Bulgaria 
Cyprus 
Denmark 
Finland 
France 
Germany 
Greece 
Ireland 
Italy 
Netherlands 
Norway 
Poland 
Portugal 
Spain 
Sweden 
Switzerland 
UK 
Ukraine 
India 
Indonesia 
Kuwait 
Malaysia 
Pakistan 
Qatar 
Singapore 
Thailand 
UAE 
Canada 
USA 
Australia 
New Zealand 
Brazil 
Kenya 
Nigeria 
South Africa 
Tanzania 
Uganda 
Betting for Beginners 
Advanced Betting 
Professional Betting 
Crypto Gambling 101 
Sports Betting Events Calendar 
Betting Systems 
Bet Calculators 
Betting Exchanges 
How to Bet on Tennis 
How to Bet on Politics 
How to Bet on Specials 
Bookie Finder 
Industry News 
Rate your bookmaker 
Submit a complaint 
Bookmaker Deposit Methods 
Gambling Licenses 
A few days ago a complaint came to the surface against Unibet for an advertisement that was published by the well known bookmaker. It was about a paid post for Facebook and a TV advertisement, that featured three men discussing the outcomes at several sports events and the reasons that led them to their decision. The advertisement closed with the line «Luck Is No Coincidence». The dispute came because of the final line, indicating that in gambling the players will not need luck, something that it was considered as misleading for the audiences.
Unibet argued that the adverts, which only referred to their sportsbook products, did not imply that gambling outcomes could be predicted. They told that the purpose of the advertisement, was to tell the players that with proper preparations they can predict the outcomes of the matches. The explanation seemed to be enough and fair for the Advertising Standards Authority, which stated that Unibet did not breach CAP Code or the BCAP Code, meaning that the advertisement will continue to exist.
Why choose Unibet
- 250.000+ pre-match events/year
- 10.000+ live events monthly
- 96%+ on Asian Handicaps
- Action betting & Cashout
- Kambi sportsbook platform
- Mobile apps
- 24/7 customer support
- Fast and free withdrawals
No need for introduction for a brand like Unibet, a global power that has managed to take over the market with millions of active players. For 20+ years the bookmaker has been on a constant rising and it has reached many strategic regulated markets, like France, Italy and Australia among others. The Kambi sportsbook platform has always been a guaranteed solution, but that doesn’t mean that there are no negative points at the Scandi giant. I noticed that the last couple of years the odds took a slight downfall, especially in minor football leagues and N.American sports. There still are many complaints about the customer support, features like partial/auto Cashout and Quickbet should be added, while the winning limits seem ridiculous to my eyes. On the other hand, the odds on the top leagues are better than Bwin’s and equal to Bet365’s, while the wide range of sports, markets and payment methods are intriguing. I can’t ignore that Unibet is a safe and sound choice for a recreational player and it is fair to the brand, which has built a solid name throughout all these years.
